Page 39 - ipma italy journal_vol 1_03_2015
P. 39

IPMA ITALY Journal of Applied Project Management
                              Volume 1 no. 3 (October 2015)

and perfection(Ding Ronggui, Zhang         and weigh (balance/measure) several
Tiqin , 2005). Third, take project         losses of opportunity while (when)
stakeholder as the subject of project      attending projects. When there are
performance evaluation. The ideal          possibilities that the stakeholders can’t
state or goal of the efforts of project    fulfill the responsibilities due to some
performance management is to satisfy       factors, role risk comes out. How to
stakeholders. Therefore, every             effectively monitor and control the
stakeholder is the evaluator of project    risks taken by different governance
performance. The degree of                 roles is the key to project governance
satisfaction can’t be judged by others.    in stakeholders’ social network.
To make evaluation be more scientific,
it’s also necessary to systematically          3.3.1 The identification of risk
train stakeholders about how to            factors
evaluate.
                                                Project stakeholders’ behaviors
     Project is a unique task oriented to  and interrelationships among them
certain outcome. And project is also       have uncertain impacts on projects.
an innovative task completed by            The impact is the key point of risk
organizing temporary resources. Rigid      research and the focus of supervision
department management based on             in project governance. Now,
function can’t meet this kind of task’s    researchers regard risk as “uncertainty
need/requirements. At this time,           of events”, and classify and analyze
process management replaces                risk factors according to this definition.
divisional management. During project      These situations are common.
life cycle, project stakeholders enter     However, from this perspective, we
and exit according to different roles      don’t take full account of the
they act in project process. The           influence on project objectives from
effective approach to achieve project      stakeholder behaviors, and don’t seize
objective is to transform from relatively  the key that it’s “human” who create
stable post management to relatively       risks. As a result, we haven’t discussed
dynamic role management. Project is        the project risk from the essence of
a system. Project performance mainly       management. Project governance risk
depends on interaction between this        mainly refers to “the possibility, impact,
system and project stakeholders. The       and degree of management of
focus of project performance should        project stakeholders’ uncertain
be put on system itself rather than be     behaviors.
confined to the aspect of human or
the local of system.                            Stakeholders’ uncertain behaviors
                                           are caused by two factors: one can
    3.3 To Control project                 be called “attribute risk” only related
management process                         to stakeholder individual factors,
                                           which varies by person, and the other
     Stakeholders in cross-organization    one is called "structure risk" related to
projects are diversified, and they have    its social attributes, which is limited by
various value propositions and             the social network composed by
resource commitments. They judge           governance roles of stakeholders.

                                                                                                38
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44